Research
My research lies at the intersection of power and culture. Specifically, I examine the struggles between the state and non-state actors over culture as a site and resource for political control and social identity. My work focuses on the domains of religion, ethnicity, and citizenship to examine how individuals, movements, and bureaucracies compete with one another to impose particular notions of reality, to demarcate boundaries of common sense, and to circumscribe alternatives. In three interrelated research fields:
- I focus on the mechanisms through which social movements leverage cultural production to create socio-political change.
- I interrogate sites of learning and pedagogy that entrench certain subjectivities over others.
- I analyze ethnic hierarchies and modes of citizenship in multicultural societies.
Religion and Politics
My current research looks at the relationship between religion and political mobilization. I am particularly interested in how religious social movements shape individuals’ subjectivity in order to achieve sociopolitical change. I am currently pursuing this research agenda through three interrelated projects. First, my book project investigates Islamist mobilization to implement a gradual and remarkably robust project of sociopolitical Islamization in Turkey since the late 1970s. A second project studies secularism and religious revival within the nation-state framework. A third project examines the organizational responses movements develop to maintain mobilization under adverse conditions. A fourth paper draws on the theoretical portion of the book manuscript to advance a culturally informed theory of mobilization. Various article manuscripts produced from these lines of research are published or in progress.
My current research looks at the relationship between religion and political mobilization. I am particularly interested in how religious social movements shape individuals’ subjectivity in order to achieve sociopolitical change. I am currently pursuing this research agenda through three interrelated projects. First, my book project investigates Islamist mobilization to implement a gradual and remarkably robust project of sociopolitical Islamization in Turkey since the late 1970s. A second project studies secularism and religious revival within the nation-state framework. A third project examines the organizational responses movements develop to maintain mobilization under adverse conditions. A fourth paper draws on the theoretical portion of the book manuscript to advance a culturally informed theory of mobilization. Various article manuscripts produced from these lines of research are published or in progress.
Islamist Rally in Diyarbakır, Milliyet Photo, 2015
|
.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FRepublic_Protests&h=1728&w=2581&tbnid=0Vfpipy8uuYfhM%3A&docid=cNbWbEilf4-QkM&ei=GLjIVcTLFIqsswGb3r-YBQ&tbm=isch&client=safari&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=545&page=3&start=72&ndsp=36&ved=0CMQCEK0DMGBqFQoTCMS3xdjfnscCFQrWLAodG-8PUw)
Mass Protest in Ankara, Photo Courtesy,
Selahattin Sönmez, 2007 |
Ethnicity, Nationalism, and Citizenship
How can ethnic boundaries survive despite nationalist and assimilationist state policies ? I address this question in an article published in Theory and Society. Based on an ethnographic study of ethnic boundaries in the ethno-religiously heterogeneous city of Antakya, a city along the Syrian border in southern Turkey, this research found that informal regulation of the inter-ethnic sexual market can maintain boundaries when formal state institutions not only ignore but also discourage their reproduction.
I currently completed another project (with Matthias Koenig) on the politics of minority rights which is forthcoming in Qualitative Sociology. This work examines conditions for resonance of global scripts among ordinary people by relying on a negative case. It draws on a longitudinal qualitative fieldwork over an 11-year span and multiple types of data I collected in three waves (2004, 2007, and 2015) also in Antakya. Specifically, we found that global diversity scripts do not match local repertoires of diversity in Antakya—or cultural schemas of perceiving and reproducing ethnic boundaries—owing to a deep-seated ambivalence among ordinary people to the category of “minority.” This mismatch, in turn, weakened popular support for substantial policy reforms advancing minority rights.
How can ethnic boundaries survive despite nationalist and assimilationist state policies ? I address this question in an article published in Theory and Society. Based on an ethnographic study of ethnic boundaries in the ethno-religiously heterogeneous city of Antakya, a city along the Syrian border in southern Turkey, this research found that informal regulation of the inter-ethnic sexual market can maintain boundaries when formal state institutions not only ignore but also discourage their reproduction.
I currently completed another project (with Matthias Koenig) on the politics of minority rights which is forthcoming in Qualitative Sociology. This work examines conditions for resonance of global scripts among ordinary people by relying on a negative case. It draws on a longitudinal qualitative fieldwork over an 11-year span and multiple types of data I collected in three waves (2004, 2007, and 2015) also in Antakya. Specifically, we found that global diversity scripts do not match local repertoires of diversity in Antakya—or cultural schemas of perceiving and reproducing ethnic boundaries—owing to a deep-seated ambivalence among ordinary people to the category of “minority.” This mismatch, in turn, weakened popular support for substantial policy reforms advancing minority rights.
Antiochians frequently compare their ethno-religiously
heterogenous city to the acclaimed mosaics in the
Antioch Archaeological Museum. 2009 © Zeynep Ozgen
heterogenous city to the acclaimed mosaics in the
Antioch Archaeological Museum. 2009 © Zeynep Ozgen